[I'm trying to get caught on the thread after being away for several days.]
Yes, it is reasonable to assume that a /48 global prefix corresponds to a site-local scope. I wouldn't rule out other arrangements but I think this will be the common situation. Rich > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore@;cs.utk.edu] > Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 9:10 AM > To: IPng > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: question regarding possible use of SLs in renumbering > > > question: > > is it reasonable to assume that if a network is advertising > one or more global prefixes via ND/RD, that the scope of a > 'site' for SL addresses corresponds to the scope in which > those global prefixes are advertised? > > in other words, would it really be reasonable to assume that > one could > use SL addresses in some renumbering protocol and have them > be able to > reach all of the hosts/routers/apps that were affected by a > prefix change? > > Keith > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
