Jari, > Jari Arkko wrote: > The question is: if you need perfectly unique addresses, > why can't you use normal, global addresses? There we > already have an existing registration process and > standards.
Pardon me? There is no such thing for end-sites as of today. > My thinking is that global addresses + statistically > unique site-locals would cover most of the need we have, > and it does not pay to construct complexity for the small > amount of folks who would need perfect uniqueness. Since truly unique would have a fee, the people that pay the fee will finance the development effort. From an enterprise standpoint, $50 a year is not significant if it buys the *guarantee* that the address is unique. The truly unique feature is like insurance. Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
