Charlie, > Charlie Perkins wrote: > Whatever the freebie allocation algorithm is, it > has to be simple enough to be free. If it costs > even $0.01, then that means paperwork for the > consumer probably including even an invoice and > managerial approval.
Agreed. > My proposal is that we allocated them linearly -- > starting at 1,000,000 or so and incrementing by one > after each allocation. That's easy and effective. I would support any scheme that makes site-locals unique as long as the non-reachability is enforced, but keep reading. > If you want something more structured,then that's > solving a different problem and should be considered > separately. One problem at a time, please! This makes sense, but the other side of this coin is that it might be a good idea to kill two birds with one stone if it does not require aiming for two years. In any case, the "one problem at a time" also applies to not trying to solve the problem of global PI with unique site-locals..... Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
