Jari, THen go fix 2119. I am basing my comments on that RFC.
Thanks /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Jari Arkko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:57 AM > To: Pekka Savola > Cc: Bound, Jim; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mobility in Nodes Requirements > > > > Pekka Savola wrote: > > >>Routers that implement MIPv6 SHOULD support HAs. Again context is > >>everything. > > > > > > There requirement: > > > > Routers SHOULD support the requirements set for all IPv6 routers. > > > > basically only means the support of new RA intervals and such > > "trivial" > > changes -- which enable smoother first-hop-router to > > MN's-in-foreign-networks scenario. Requiring HA is > entirely different > > issue. > > This is correct. There are indeed two issues, see Sections > 8.3 and 8.4 in the mobile ipv6 specification. > > As to the requirement to support HAs in all routers... I > don't have a strong opinion but I kind of like the MAY. This > is because I usually prefer features selling themselves for > their benefits, rather than due to them being mandatory in > some standard... > > Jari > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
