> The same people are also trying to understand why a number of > applications doesn't work in their network and how come that trojan > send their password file to a unknown destination. Private addresses > comes at a cost that is becoming more and more apparent. No need to pay > that price in IPv6 as well as in IPv4. > > If you absolutely want NAT take a random address block and NAT it for > you. You will get the same problems / benefits.
Who is going to priovide the registered addresses that will be used for all corporations and at what price? Most companies will not want to have to pay for a public address for all their printers and copiers (and microwaves as those are added by Microsoft). > Site-locals was voted down in the WG meeting in SF. How do those of us who can not attend these conferences get into these limited participation votes? I for one can not make frequent international trips for a non-customer related meeting. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
