> Site-locals was voted down in the WG meeting in SF. The IETF doesn't vote ... and there is no way a decision gets made in a meeting. It doesn't matter that a few vocal people want to remove a capability because they don't understand it, the rules of the IETF are that decisions are based on mail list discussions.
Site-locals are useful exactly for the case that started this thread, though 6to4 from the public side of each nat would also work. They are also useful for the intermittent connected network, because internal connections are not dropped at every connect event. Those applications that are concerned about the potential of breaking have a clearly defined prefix to avoid using. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
