> As long as we are clear that, the "site-local" does not get special > treatment in terms of routing and dns, we should care less about if > "site-local" is deprecated or still lived. It's perfectly fine and > actually somewhat useful if "site-local" plays the same role as in > IPv4 addresses defined in rfc1918. > Or to ask it a different way, (and maybe this is the solution) will all of the 10.x.x.x (and the other IPv4 private addresses) suddenly become globally broadcast?
This is a bigger problem. What will an IPv6 application or hardware do with a ::10.x.x.x address? -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
