NO -- Do not deprecate site-local unicast addressing.
- Site-locals should be retained for disconnected sites.
- Site-locals should be retained for intermittently
connected sites.
- Site-locals should be retained as a means for internal
connections to survive global prefix renumbering.
- Other #1
In the absence of a defined private prefix people will either
invent their own or use 2002::/16 with RFC1918 addresses which
will cause worse problems than SLs.
- Other #2
SLs should be retained since they provide a large and free
address space for anybody to use, test, research and develop
with.
--
Mike Saywell
Southampton University, UK.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
