On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 14:37, Margaret Wasserman wrote: > The question is: > > Should we deprecate IPv6 site-local unicast addressing? > > Valid responses are: > > "YES -- Deprecate site-local unicast addressing". > "NO -- Do not deprecate site-local unicast addressing".
I think the question needs to be more specific: - Deprecate addresses in fec0::/48? - Deprecate addresses in fec0::/10 (with no scheme to make bits 10:47 probabilistically or globally unique at a site)? - Deprecate all non-PA, non-link-local unicast addresses? Regards, =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Steven L. Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ericsson IP Infrastructure +1 919-472-9913 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
