Steven Blake wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 03:41, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > As I already said under another subject line, > > what I understood we were deprecating is SL as defined > > in the current address architecture, i.e. FEC0::/10. > > Do you mean the e-mail where you said the following? > > --> I prefer to think about this the other way round: kill the ambiguous > --> space, which we have learnt the hard way is a mistake, and then > --> design the alternative, which may well be unrouteable GUPI (and for > --> all I care, starts with FEC::/10).
yes > > > That's the only formal definition of SL, so I don't see > > what else we could be referring to. > > Well, I'm still confused. what do you think we are possibly deprecating, if it isn't the current definition? Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
