> Ole Troan wrote: > I agree with kre, stick to fec0::/10. Me too. A scheme with the lower part of it for random and the upper part of it for a fee would work too. Although this would represent only 15 prefixes per person in the long run (that's only 4 million subnet for a family of 4, way to small to design a home network :-) let's keep in mind that these are private addresses and not everyone would need one.
Michel. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
