Bob,
> >>Hence, I see no real reason at all to stray from FEC0::/10 - and lots >>of reasons to remain in that space. > > I think you are suggesting that the draft be changed to reuse the > FEC0::/10 space with a resulting 38-bit global ID. This would allow > for 274,877,906,944 prefixes, or 30 per person in 2050. > > My preference would be for a larger global ID, but I would like to > hear what other folks think. > For what it is worth, I agree with kre as well. tim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
