Zefram wrote:
>People have started to suggest attaching scoping semantics to fc00::/7
>adddresses, which is what led to fc00::/10.  I think this was a mistake.
>Leave fc00::/7 without special semantics -- that's the point of it.
>People that want scoping: if you want fc00::/10, you know where to get it.

Erk... "fc00::/10" should be "fec0::/10" in both places, of course.

-zefram
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to