> What I am trying to get to is:
> 
> - Application designers who want to work in the "end-to-end clean"
> Internet and who do  not care to support the corner cases should be
> able to do so.
> 
> - The default address selection rules should favor solutions based on 
> global  addressing, I think we all agree that if such a solution is 
> reasonably possible, it  should be used.  With the defaults above, the
> 
> "path of least resistance" is not to use  limited range, which is
> good.
> 
> - Finally, if a solution requires local addressing, and application
> writers want to  support it, there needs to be a standardized way to
> do this (which is why local  addresses must be defined and
> recognizable).

IMHO, the need for local addressing has not been established, and we
should not burden either hosts, apps, or networks with it in the absence
of strong justification.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to