Alain Durand wrote: > You're asking the DNS views to be in sync with the routing > views. Possible to achieve at a cost if there is one local > and one global view, as it is current practise with two-fade > DNS, but much harder when you have n enterprise networks > joining to create an extranet. In any case, this is a layer violation.
Yes, a layer violation which is in wide deployment and use today. Yes there are technical issues which could be dealt with to make it work better, but those won't happen as long as the IETF DNS community refuses to step up to them. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
