I think we should explicitly disallow a mismatch between local & global. In addition, to achieve the use of globally routed in the non-local cases the name resolution system needs to provide contextually appropriate answers.
You're asking the DNS views to be in sync with the routing views. Possible to achieve at a cost if there is one local and one global view, as it is current practise with two-fade DNS, but much harder when you have n enterprise networks joining to create an extranet. In any case, this is a layer violation.
- Alain.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
