-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On onsdag, aug 6, 2003, at 10:30 Europe/Stockholm, Aidan Williams wrote: > >> -2. Realize that if the issue at stake here has more to do with >> getting addresses >> than with their actual scope/range, something probably can be >> done working with the registries. > > I don't think that is true. The local-ness of these addresses avoids > the issue of having to scalably route the PI space. I can't see > significant differences in process between globally unique local > address allocation and a globally unique PI address allocation. Bingo! So let's kill SLs and start working on the real issue... - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.2 iQA/AwUBPzkLrqarNKXTPFCVEQLyUQCgt7+tzyMngo5TUPuI7WbC1OHVn+YAn08g wAzxQnfB+CeFXihapfelJMD1 =VTbj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
