Several thousand hours of IPv6 usage on XP and Windows 7 prompts me to wholly 
agree with Brian.
The way DNS works now fits 95% plus of the transition environments.
The proposed DNS hack will be obsolete before it can be passed thru the IETF 
anyway since IPv6 usage is growing exponentially during 2010.
Comcast alone will account for 50% of the transition market during this 
calendar year.  And they have hard dates for completing IPv6 implementation 
during 2010.
So don't break DNS for the 95% using it successfully today for the 5% that are 
not working today without manual intervention.
Carroll Perkins

________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian E 
Carpenter [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 11:16 AM
To: Ed Jankiewicz
Cc: IPv6 Operations; 6man
Subject: Re: FYI:  DNSOPS presentation

As every successful IPv6 user on Windows XP knows, the hack
would break all Windows XP IPv6 usage (since it can't resolve
DNS over IPv6 at all).

I prefer the current situation, where occasionally I have to
disable IPv6 manually due to being on an IPv6-broken network
where DNS serves up AAAA records and my regular tunnel is too
slow. This seems OK, since people using v6 on XP are normally doing
so as conscious early adopters.

I do think that Google's solution to this, i.e. being selective
about who gets the AAAA records in the first place, is much less
of hack with less harmful side effects.

Surely a better hack would be for recursive resolvers in IPv6-broken
networks not to serve up AAAA records at all? Tunnel users could
always find another resolver.

Regards
   Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to