I agree with what James just posted. Since this has hopped over to v6ops from dnsops, I thought I'd post here what I wrote over there, as I think it's important as we're working on solutions w/o a clear agreement on the problem:
It seems that have the cart before the horse, so to speak. IMHO, we need to do the following (and there's no reason they cannot occur rapidly): 1 - Develop a clear problem statement that outlines (1) how "broken" users are defined and (2) what effects this "brokenness" has on these end users (or other parts of the Internet). 2 - Describe all the various methods and tactics by which end user "brokenness" can be detected. This may include website-based detection, DNS-query-based detection, or a variety of other methods. 3 - Then, after we have agreement on Problem Definition and Problem Detection, we can measure the problem to understand what the scope or scale of the problem is. 4 - After we understand Problem Definition, Problem Detection, and Problem Scope, then you can arrive at possible solutions. Seems like in this case we sort of *started* here, which concerns me and I think we need to be careful that discussion thus far does not constrain development of a full list of Solution Options. I further believe we will need to encourage the pursuit of multiple solutions simultaneously. Lastly, just because end user software upgrades may be difficult doesn't mean we shouldn't do them and shouldn't focus just as much energy on those than other options. Jason -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
