Hi, * Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
> Completely in agreement, although I'd like to add "...and whether > such solutions are required." Currently, the number of end users who can connect to a single-stack IPv4 web site is greater than the number of end users who can connect to a dual-stack web site. This situation must change, or you won't be seeing much IPv6 content appearing on the internet anytime soon. > I feel uneasy messing around with the DNS by introducing "ugly hacks" > to resolve a problem with "0.078% of people", thus affecting 99.922% > of people who had no problem and who might then end up having a > problem due to the hack. The obvious "solution" to this is currently to _not_ deploy IPv6 on existing content. For now, that will keep ~100% of users happy, and doesn't require any DNS hacks/whitelists to be maintained. But I still would like to deploy IPv6 somehow. Suggestions on how exactly I can go about doing that, without messing around with DNS or breaking connectivity for users who up until now have had no problems, would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ Tel: +47 21 54 41 27 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
