In message <[email protected]>, Tore Anderson writes:
> Hi,
> 
> * Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
> 
> > Completely in agreement, although I'd like to add "...and whether 
> > such solutions are required."
> 
> Currently, the number of end users who can connect to a single-stack
> IPv4 web site is greater than the number of end users who can connect
> to a dual-stack web site.  This situation must change, or you won't be
> seeing much IPv6 content appearing on the internet anytime soon.
> 
> > I feel uneasy messing around with the DNS by introducing "ugly hacks"
> > to resolve a problem with "0.078% of people", thus affecting 99.922%
> > of people who had no problem and who might then end up having a
> > problem due to the hack.
> 
> The obvious "solution" to this is currently to _not_ deploy IPv6 on
> existing content.  For now, that will keep ~100% of users happy, and
> doesn't require any DNS hacks/whitelists to be maintained.
> 
> But I still would like to deploy IPv6 somehow.  Suggestions on how
> exactly I can go about doing that, without messing around with DNS or
> breaking connectivity for users who up until now have had no problems,
> would be greatly appreciated.

The first thing is to publish a complete description of the testing
methodology and envionment.  So far I havn't see it.  Most of the
transition technology involves encapsulation so was the mtu set to
prevent pmtud being triggered due to encapsulation in IPv4?

        route add net 2002::/16 mtu 1480

or 

        route add net 2002::/16 mtu 1280

What are the figures when you do this?  Does either of these change the
percentages?

Similarly for

        route change net ::/0 mtu 1480
and

        route change net ::/0 mtu 1280

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: [email protected]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to