On 08/31/2013 10:28 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Hi Fernando, > > I'm biased, but I'd prefer the reference (your first suggestion), unless > the ext-transmit draft gets stuck in the process, in which case you could > make an editorial change later, even up to AUTH48.
As noted, I'm open to any of the two options. That said, would a normative ref to draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit be really appropriate/correct? If you think about it, that'd be an "informational reference" rather than an authoritative one... (you don't need to read draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit to understand draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-05.txt). For instance, the IANA registry itself is not a normative reference. Anyone else has an opinion on this one? Chairs? > BTW check the IANA URL too; I think you had a pointer to a .txt file, but > these days IANA is .xml based. Do you know which file is the authoritative one? Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
