> > An automated reply is better than none at all.
>
> I don't really see how you figure that. To me they are equally useless.

I was speaking about EAS alerts.  Right now I have most of my clients
configured to automatically relay any serious EAS alerts such as tornado
warnings and Amber Alerts.  If they are not manually forwarded in a specific
time period, the EAS equipment automatically sends them.  If the station has
been signed off, then that is one less source for these alerts.  An
automated EAS alert is better than none at all.

> These proposed FCC requirements are simply a wrongheaded attempt to do
> something to address problems caused by prior deregulation going too
> far and/or having unanticipated results. When they permitted unattended
> operations, it wasn't really expected that stations would do this 24/7.
> Stations owners trying to cut costs came up with that, and absent any
> enforced requirement for emergency/weather/disaster alerts, many owners
> weren't going to spend for it.
>
> There's an old proverb that says that when people are left to do as
> they please, they usually imitate each other, and that's sure where we
> are programming-wise...

To be honest, I really have no problem with things as they are regarding
unattended operations.  In many ways, the automated EAS equipment will do a
better job than some minimally trained, minimum wage babysitter.  I've seen
jocks ignore or screw up some alerts that really needed to be sent
immediately.

My real concern with all of this is strictly the EAS part.  Programming of
the cookie-cutter satellite formats is not the best use of a station
assignment.  Though I have to say it's better than some local programming...

Craig Healy
Providence, RI


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to