Like Gary I noted improvement this morning, but I'd go a bit
farther and say quite dramatic improvement. Actually the best morning
here for several weeks. Rather unusual too in that Japan didn't seem to
be a factor. There were so-so carriers on 594, 693, 774 etc. but
nothing approaching audio. The audio was all on the upper band, as were
the strongest carriers. 1593 wound up being the most potent signal,
with HLAZ not far behind. A few more mornings like this would
rekindle the morning motivation!
1305 unID Faint audio with man and woman talking at 1452. I've had
Korea here in the past, but the intonation sounded more Chinese.
1359 CHINA CNR1
Mostly very faint, but played a piece of distinctive music at 1454
which I was easily able to // on 1593.
1404 unID Mostly just a strong carrier, but faint audio with man
talking at 1451 peak.
1557 unID Easy listening vocal by a woman at 1437. Pretty
certain it was Taiwan, but too much 1560 splatter to definitely
say so.
1566 KOREA, S HLAZ
Fair signal, with Chinese talk by a man and woman with musical
background at 1430. Also a quite noticable second carrier
about 35 Hz high.
1575 THAILAND VOA
First reached audio at 1432. Got up to fair signal with man
and woman in SE Asian language, but never as strong as 1566 and
1593.
1584 unID
Like 1404, mostly just a strong carrier, but very faint traces
of audio at peaks at 1435 and again at 1451. Only one carrier
here today, and that one on frequency.
1593 CHINA CNR1
First noted at 1436 with bits and piece of man and woman in
Chinese through the splatter from Seattle on 1590. Getting
through the splatter pretty well by 1445, and brushing it aside
by 1452.
Had audio on 1422 as well, but it was a spur from a US station.
Notable carriers on 1044,1116,1206 (one on freq and one about 30 Hz
low), 1269, 1287, 1323, 1377, 1386, 1494
73,
Nigel Pimblett
Dunmore, AB
Perseus SDR & Wellbrook Phased Array
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: [email protected]
