Craig I am surprised that JJ's are so much better on your KAZ that is aimed
at least 40 deg from them than on your Superloop basically aimed right at
them. Your Superloop is 45 x 20 ft so 900 sq ft under it.

What is the height (bottom wire to apex) of your 72 ft KAZ?  73 KAZ worried
something might be wrong with connections to your Superloop.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:24 AM Mark Durenberger <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks Mark.  Kaz reminds us that D-KAZ Aspect Ratio is important to a good
> EZNEC result so, presumably, the same is true in real antenna life.
>
> One of the measurement runs I've made for the upcoming D-KAZ Cookbook
> compared two different apex heights.
>
>
> Cheers!
>
> Mark Durenberger
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IRCA <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Mark Connelly via
> IRCA
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 9:47 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Mark Connelly <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] KAZ versus Pennant/Flag
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to