--- Begin Message ---

HelloI agree with the comment:  I always felt like I was DXing through a 
microscope. The display means you only check sections of the recording. The new 
CUSTOM FREQS facility enable you to save the frequency setting you found best. 
The detailed frequency read out means you can discount or not stations before 
any audio peaks. True JAGUAR has a multiplicity of settings but to keep things 
simple I only use the ones that work for me. I paid around $50 for JAGUAR PRO 
and worth every Cent.

Best wishes

Barry 

Carlisle UK.  Lat. 55.0119N   Lon. -2.9668W. 

    On Thursday, 29 November 2018, 15:30:00 GMT, Volodya S <[email protected]> 
wrote:  
 
 While DXing in PEI, I was re-introduced to SDR Console.  For reviewing
files, I found it superior (simpler to use and easier to go forward/back,
and to proceed from wav to wav files) compared to the native Perseus
program.  No comment re audio recovery.  Couldn't tell any difference
there....Walt

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 1:49 PM bill [his.com] <[email protected]> wrote:

> As long as we’re discussing Jaguar ...
>
> I always felt like I was DXing through a microscope with it.  While other
> programs default to either a waterfall or peak-and-valley graph of a hunk
> of spectrum, Jaguar defaults to a microscopic view of the frequency you’re
> DXing.
>
> I have used both full-bore Jaguar [a few years ago or more] and Jaguar
> Lite and was never able to overcome the learning curve with either.
>
> Like Chuck said though, I do go back to Jaguar Lite every now and then to
> review wav files to see if I’ve missed something.
>
> I have never really used the full power of Jaguar — particularly the
> analysis tools and such — though I REALLY liked the full-featured Mestor
> built-in that included all the things I wish the stand-alone version
> released years ago leaves out.
>
> It was if Jaguar required a certain ’style’ of very serious DXing that I
> was just no in-sync with.  My fault, not theirs.
>
> Bill Whitacre
> Alexandria, VA
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: [email protected]
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

  

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to