+1

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 7, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Cory Foy <cory....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok, I like to propose a pause in action.
> 
> Here's what we know. Jimmy has moved on, as has Jim. Tomas is the main person 
> left, and from the emails we've received, he's only working on it part-time. 
> I don't know the politics of this specific org, but being an ex-softie I do 
> have an idea, and that hunch is that the politics that caused the reshuffle 
> were not a conspiracy theory against IronRuby, but just normal organization 
> dysfunction and quarterly reorganization.
> 
> We also know thay we have a community of people who are passionate about 
> IronRuby, and a secondary wave of people driven into action by the events of 
> the past day or so. It stands to reason, from work I've done in other 
> communties, that one or two will end up being long term participants because 
> of the new awareness.
> 
> That said, I don't think that what we should do right now is fork it, since 
> IronRuby relies heavily on the DLR which wouldn't be controlled. This is not 
> to say that we take it off the table. Rather we need to ask ourselves what 
> holes have now opened up that we need to fill:
> 
> 1) Jimmy provided leadership and vision for the project. We've now lost that, 
> and either Tomas will pick this up internally, or we will need an external 
> person to run with the vision. Regardless, the person will have to interface 
> with and understand the vision from the Microsoft side.
> 
> 2) Tomas already mentioned needs like a CI and gatekeeper. I bet there are 
> lots of other needs, and if this is truly a community-owned movement, we need 
> to engage with Tomas and the remaining team to understand what else we're 
> missing.
> 
> 3) IronRuby has likely taken a huge blow of credibility from the enterprise 
> adoption side, because if it isn't supported by Microsoft PSS, they will be 
> unlikely to use it internally or in their products. 
> 
> All three of these are vital points that we need to think about as a 
> community. Someone is going to have to step up to take charge of this - and 
> it's not going to come from the Mono side. Tomas may be willing to take 
> charge as much as possible - no one has asked him, and that's a shame.
> 
> IronRuby has not had a heart attack which requires CPR. That means we need to 
> take a measured, levelheaded response as a community and work to understand 
> how we can help and how we can respond in a way that makes sense. We already 
> know from Jimmy's tweets that he's planning an email for the group - how can 
> we take advantage of the knowledge Jim and Jimmy have, and support the work 
> Tomas is doing?
> 
> Finally, we may have a burst of energy right now, but no form of sprinting is 
> going to help solve this. This is not a "we have to take action now before we 
> lose the opportunity!" moment. The code is there. Many of the contributors 
> are there, and know what is going on internally. Let's collaborate and find a 
> way to make this project a real success.
> 
> Cory 
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 7, 2010, at 20:36, William Green <w...@hotgazpacho.org> wrote:
> 
>> I agree with Michael here. As long as the canonical source for
>> IronRuby lives in TFS behind the big blue firewall, with only MSFT
>> employees as core committers, there is a problem.
>> 
>> What I propose is that we, as a community, designate the github repo
>> as the canonical one, and that whoever controls it opens up commit
>> access beyond the MSFT core team, perhaps to those that have already
>> had accepted contribution. (this may already be in place, I don't
>> know)
>> 
>> Bottom line is that MSFT has decided they no longer desire to invest
>> in the project. If we want IronRuby, we're going to have to make it
>> happen, on our own.
>> 
>> --
>> Will Green
>> http://hotgazpacho.org/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 7, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Michael Letterle <michael.lette...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> If Microsoft was simply sponsoring development and putting its stamp
>>> on it, it wouldn't be a problem.. but the fact that MS "owns" it IS a
>>> bottleneck, as been from the start.  "Sync to TFS" commits make me
>>> cringe everytime I see them.
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Jim Deville <jdevi...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>> I guess I never really sent the mail that I meant to send about my
>>>> progression.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Similar to Jimmy, I’ve also made the incredibly hard decision to move on as
>>>> well. I’ve been working on the JavaScript team now for about 2 weeks. I’ve
>>>> made this decision for many of the same reasons as Jimmy, but for various
>>>> personal reasons, I decided to remain with MS instead of leaving. I will
>>>> still be working with IronRuby, it just won’t be my primary function
>>>> anymore.  I also had a wonderful time on the team, and I will really miss
>>>> working directly with them.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I agree that IronRuby is not a big community, but I don’t know that it is a
>>>> problem unless we let it be one J. I also feel that MS owning the code 
>>>> isn’t
>>>> a problem. It’s not like it really benefits anyone inside of MS, it 
>>>> benefits
>>>> us, the users J. It also benefits the Ruby community at large if we 
>>>> continue
>>>> to make IronRuby a great product that people want to use in their .NET
>>>> applications, because it shows people Ruby J
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I understand that this is sad, and for some, expected L, but I hope that
>>>> people still continue doing the awesome things people have been doing J
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> JD
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
>>>> [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Orion Edwards
>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 2:43 PM
>>>> 
>>>> To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>>>> Subject: [Ironruby-core] "Start spreading the news"
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I'm sure most of you have seen this already, but I hadn't seen Jimmy's
>>>> "farewell Microsoft" blog post posted to the list, so here it is if anyone
>>>> hasn't read it
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> http://blog.jimmy.schementi.com/2010/08/start-spreading-news-future-of-jimmy.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I'd like to thank Jimmy for his work thus far on IronRuby, and certainly
>>>> wish you the best of luck at your new job and living in NYC. From that 
>>>> point
>>>> of view, it's happy days.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The news about Microsoft's internal handling of IronRuby however makes me
>>>> rather sad, and frankly a bit worried about the future of IronRuby in
>>>> general. If there's now only 2 part-time developers working on IR inside
>>>> Microsoft, and they've been told not to develop any new features, then 
>>>> where
>>>> does that leave us?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> While IronRuby is open source (yay), It unfortunately hasn't seem to have
>>>> become quite big enough (unlike JRuby) to be self sustaining.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I personally also perceive somewhat of a problem, in that (again, unlike
>>>> with JRuby) Microsoft "owns" IronRuby. Last I knew, committers still had to
>>>> sign a copyright assignment form to MS, and MS controls all the 
>>>> repositories
>>>> and other assorted stuff. (AFAIK Charles has personally controlled all the
>>>> JRuby repos since day one and still does).
>>>> 
>>>> This provides a LARGE (to me at least) disincentive to contribute to
>>>> IronRuby in the future. Because MS owns IronRuby, I feel like if I were to
>>>> commit code, it would not be for the benefit of a nice friendly
>>>> community-driven open source group, it would be for the benefit of 
>>>> Microsoft
>>>> Corporation.
>>>> 
>>>> I was happy to accept this when MS were putting a lot of work into 
>>>> IronRuby,
>>>> but now that they're not, my feeling is "So Microsoft have bailed and left
>>>> us hanging, why on earth would I want to do work on their behalf after
>>>> they've just done that?"
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> At any rate, I've not committed any code to IronRuby (I've come close
>>>> several times, but never just had the time) so my opinion is largely
>>>> irrelevant, I just hope that other potential committers with more time and
>>>> skill than I don't end up feeling this way too :-(
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>>>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Michael Letterle
>>> IronRuby MVP
>>> http://blog.prokrams.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
> _______________________________________________
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
_______________________________________________
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

Reply via email to