Hi Dan! Yes, please go on rolling a new 'final' release now ;)
As Benson explained already, there is usually no need to do -rc stuff upfront since we use staging repos (which we can drop if the content is not perfect). LieGrue, strub --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Dan Haywood <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release candidate > 0.1.2-RC4-incubating > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 12:31 PM > OK... so I'll now push out a final > release to vote on again (because I > presume we don't want our first release to have an RC > postfix). > > This will be the same content, but just with the POM > versions updated. > Details in the next vote thread. > > Dan > ~~~~~~~~~~~ > > On 20/06/2011 12:20, Mark Struberg wrote: > > Hi Dan! > > > > I've seen you did some tagging, branching _after_ we > voted. I know this is kind of nit picking but we must ship > _exactly_ the source binary we've voted on! No single bit > change is allowed, that must have the exact same sha1! > > > > Of course, we can do a release without the -RCx > postfix, but we would then need to re-do the vote again. > > > > I know this sounds ridiculous in the first moment, but > if the md5 changes, how could you be safe that nothing > important got changed? > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> From: Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release > candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 10:55 AM > >> Nour, > >> will do... > >> > >> can I ask though that you please don't post to [email protected], > >> > >> because I would like to. (I want to explain > how the > >> release I would > >> like the vote on general relates to the release > candidate > >> that was voted > >> on in isis-dev). > >> > >> Thx > >> Dan > >> > >> > >> > >> On 20/06/2011 10:49, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > >>> +1 @Mark > >>> > >>> Would you please do it Dan so I announce the > [VOTE] > >> pass on general@ > >>> and then we are ready to [VOTE] on there. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Mark > Struberg<[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> Hi Dan! > >>>> > >>>> It's usus to explicitly list the names > (or > >> apacheids) of those who voted. Just to make it a > bit easier > >> to control. Could you please add those? > >>>> txs and LieGrue, > >>>> strub > >>>> > >>>> --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>> From: Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > >>>>> Subject: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis > release > >> candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating > >>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 7:43 AM > >>>>> This vote is now closed, and has > >>>>> passed: > >>>>> > >>>>> 6 +1 votes (+3 from members). > >>>>> No 0 votes > >>>>> No -1 votes. > >>>>> > >>>>> I am now going to cut the final > release > >> (0.1.2-incubating) > >>>>> from the same revision, and will > request a > >> lazy consensus > >>>>> vote on [email protected] > >>>>> for the final release. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, all > >>>>> Dan > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> >
