On [email protected], is a request for lazy consensus on the RC sufficient (eg as bean-val did [1]), or is it necessary to request a formal vote (eg as it would seem that Wink and Manifold did [2], [3]).
Perhaps it should be worded as a formal vote, with the votes from isis-dev "carried over" automatically as implied +1s in the [email protected] thread ? Thx Dan [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/28115 [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201105.mbox/%[email protected]%3E [3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201105.mbox/%[email protected]%3E On 21 June 2011 10:22, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > no problem. > > It's our first release, but it wont be the last ;) > > Thanks for all the hard work on it! > > LieGrue, > strub > > > --- On Tue, 6/21/11, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Dan Haywood <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release candidate > 0.1.2-RC4-incubating > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 6:15 AM > > For some reason I'm hitting a problem > > trying to upload the "final" > > release artifacts up to the staging repo... I've > > tried 3 times now, in > > each case it uploads the first big artifact (the > > source-release.zip), > > appears to hang for ~70 minutes, and then I get a 500 > > server error. > > > > Given that we do have RC4 voted on and the "final" release > > would be > > identical in content, how do people feel about me putting > > the RC4 > > forward for voting on in [email protected]? > > It'd be nice to get > > that release out, and my week's a little busy to try to > > track down this > > upload problem. > > > > Thx > > Dan > > > > > > On 20/06/2011 17:11, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > Hi Dan! > > > > > > Yes, please go on rolling a new 'final' release now > > ;) > > > > > > As Benson explained already, there is usually no need > > to do -rc stuff upfront since we use staging repos (which we > > can drop if the content is not perfect). > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> From: Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release > > candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 12:31 PM > > >> OK... so I'll now push out a final > > >> release to vote on again (because I > > >> presume we don't want our first release to have an > > RC > > >> postfix). > > >> > > >> This will be the same content, but just with the > > POM > > >> versions updated. > > >> Details in the next vote thread. > > >> > > >> Dan > > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~ > > >> > > >> On 20/06/2011 12:20, Mark Struberg wrote: > > >>> Hi Dan! > > >>> > > >>> I've seen you did some tagging, branching > > _after_ we > > >> voted. I know this is kind of nit picking but we > > must ship > > >> _exactly_ the source binary we've voted on! No > > single bit > > >> change is allowed, that must have the exact same > > sha1! > > >>> Of course, we can do a release without the > > -RCx > > >> postfix, but we would then need to re-do the vote > > again. > > >>> I know this sounds ridiculous in the first > > moment, but > > >> if the md5 changes, how could you be safe that > > nothing > > >> important got changed? > > >>> LieGrue, > > >>> strub > > >>> > > >>> --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >>>> From: Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis > > release > > >> candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating > > >>>> To: [email protected] > > >>>> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 10:55 AM > > >>>> Nour, > > >>>> will do... > > >>>> > > >>>> can I ask though that you please don't > > post to [email protected], > > >>>> > > >>>> because I would like to. (I want to > > explain > > >> how the > > >>>> release I would > > >>>> like the vote on general relates to the > > release > > >> candidate > > >>>> that was voted > > >>>> on in isis-dev). > > >>>> > > >>>> Thx > > >>>> Dan > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On 20/06/2011 10:49, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > wrote: > > >>>>> +1 @Mark > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Would you please do it Dan so I > > announce the > > >> [VOTE] > > >>>> pass on general@ > > >>>>> and then we are ready to [VOTE] on > > there. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:09 AM, > > Mark > > >> Struberg<[email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> Hi Dan! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> It's usus to explicitly list the > > names > > >> (or > > >>>> apacheids) of those who voted. Just to > > make it a > > >> bit easier > > >>>> to control. Could you please add those? > > >>>>>> txs and LieGrue, > > >>>>>> strub > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan > > Haywood<[email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> From: Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > > >>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] [RESULT] > > Apache Isis > > >> release > > >>>> candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating > > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, > > 7:43 AM > > >>>>>>> This vote is now closed, and > > has > > >>>>>>> passed: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> 6 +1 votes (+3 from members). > > >>>>>>> No 0 votes > > >>>>>>> No -1 votes. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I am now going to cut the > > final > > >> release > > >>>> (0.1.2-incubating) > > >>>>>>> from the same revision, and > > will > > >> request a > > >>>> lazy consensus > > >>>>>>> vote on [email protected] > > >>>>>>> for the final release. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Thanks, all > > >>>>>>> Dan > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >
