no problem. It's our first release, but it wont be the last ;)
Thanks for all the hard work on it! LieGrue, strub --- On Tue, 6/21/11, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Dan Haywood <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release candidate > 0.1.2-RC4-incubating > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 6:15 AM > For some reason I'm hitting a problem > trying to upload the "final" > release artifacts up to the staging repo... I've > tried 3 times now, in > each case it uploads the first big artifact (the > source-release.zip), > appears to hang for ~70 minutes, and then I get a 500 > server error. > > Given that we do have RC4 voted on and the "final" release > would be > identical in content, how do people feel about me putting > the RC4 > forward for voting on in [email protected]? > It'd be nice to get > that release out, and my week's a little busy to try to > track down this > upload problem. > > Thx > Dan > > > On 20/06/2011 17:11, Mark Struberg wrote: > > Hi Dan! > > > > Yes, please go on rolling a new 'final' release now > ;) > > > > As Benson explained already, there is usually no need > to do -rc stuff upfront since we use staging repos (which we > can drop if the content is not perfect). > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> From: Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release > candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 12:31 PM > >> OK... so I'll now push out a final > >> release to vote on again (because I > >> presume we don't want our first release to have an > RC > >> postfix). > >> > >> This will be the same content, but just with the > POM > >> versions updated. > >> Details in the next vote thread. > >> > >> Dan > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> > >> On 20/06/2011 12:20, Mark Struberg wrote: > >>> Hi Dan! > >>> > >>> I've seen you did some tagging, branching > _after_ we > >> voted. I know this is kind of nit picking but we > must ship > >> _exactly_ the source binary we've voted on! No > single bit > >> change is allowed, that must have the exact same > sha1! > >>> Of course, we can do a release without the > -RCx > >> postfix, but we would then need to re-do the vote > again. > >>> I know this sounds ridiculous in the first > moment, but > >> if the md5 changes, how could you be safe that > nothing > >> important got changed? > >>> LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>> --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> From: Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis > release > >> candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 10:55 AM > >>>> Nour, > >>>> will do... > >>>> > >>>> can I ask though that you please don't > post to [email protected], > >>>> > >>>> because I would like to. (I want to > explain > >> how the > >>>> release I would > >>>> like the vote on general relates to the > release > >> candidate > >>>> that was voted > >>>> on in isis-dev). > >>>> > >>>> Thx > >>>> Dan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 20/06/2011 10:49, Mohammad Nour El-Din > wrote: > >>>>> +1 @Mark > >>>>> > >>>>> Would you please do it Dan so I > announce the > >> [VOTE] > >>>> pass on general@ > >>>>> and then we are ready to [VOTE] on > there. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:09 AM, > Mark > >> Struberg<[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> Hi Dan! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It's usus to explicitly list the > names > >> (or > >>>> apacheids) of those who voted. Just to > make it a > >> bit easier > >>>> to control. Could you please add those? > >>>>>> txs and LieGrue, > >>>>>> strub > >>>>>> > >>>>>> --- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan > Haywood<[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> From: Dan Haywood<[email protected]> > >>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] [RESULT] > Apache Isis > >> release > >>>> candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>>> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, > 7:43 AM > >>>>>>> This vote is now closed, and > has > >>>>>>> passed: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 6 +1 votes (+3 from members). > >>>>>>> No 0 votes > >>>>>>> No -1 votes. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I am now going to cut the > final > >> release > >>>> (0.1.2-incubating) > >>>>>>> from the same revision, and > will > >> request a > >>>> lazy consensus > >>>>>>> vote on [email protected] > >>>>>>> for the final release. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, all > >>>>>>> Dan > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >
