Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating

[Dan Haywood]

For some reason I'm hitting a problem trying to upload the "final" 
release artifacts up to the staging repo...  I've tried 3 times now, in 
each case it uploads the first big artifact (the source-release.zip), 
appears to hang for ~70 minutes, and then I get a 500 server error.

Given that we do have RC4 voted on and the "final" release would be 
identical in content, how do people feel about me putting the RC4 
forward for voting on in general@incubator.a.o?  It'd be nice to get 
that release out, and my week's a little busy to try to track down this 
upload problem.

Thx
Dan


On 20/06/2011 17:11, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Dan!

Yes, please go on rolling a new 'final' release now ;)

As Benson explained already, there is usually no need to do -rc stuff upfront 
since we use staging repos (which we can drop if the content is not perfect).

LieGrue,
strub

--- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<dkhayw...@gmail.com>  wrote:

From: Dan Haywood<dkhayw...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating
To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 12:31 PM
OK... so I'll now push out a final
release to vote on again (because I
presume we don't want our first release to have an RC
postfix).

This will be the same content, but just with the POM
versions updated. 
Details in the next vote thread.

Dan
~~~~~~~~~~~

On 20/06/2011 12:20, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Dan!

I've seen you did some tagging, branching _after_ we
voted. I know this is kind of nit picking but we must ship
_exactly_ the source binary we've voted on! No single bit
change is allowed, that must have the exact same sha1!
Of course, we can do a release without the -RCx
postfix, but we would then need to re-do the vote again.
I know this sounds ridiculous in the first moment, but
if the md5 changes, how could you be safe that nothing
important got changed?
LieGrue,
strub

--- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<dkhayw...@gmail.com>
wrote:
From: Dan Haywood<dkhayw...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis release
candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating
To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 10:55 AM
Nour,
will do...

can I ask though that you please don't post to general@incubator.a.o,

because I would like to.  (I want to explain
how the
release I would
like the vote on general relates to the release
candidate
that was voted
on in isis-dev).

Thx
Dan



On 20/06/2011 10:49, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
+1 @Mark

Would you please do it Dan so I announce the
[VOTE]
pass on general@
and then we are ready to [VOTE] on there.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Mark
Struberg<strub...@yahoo.de>
wrote:
Hi Dan!

It's usus to explicitly list the names
(or
apacheids) of those who voted. Just to make it a
bit easier
to control. Could you please add those?
txs and LieGrue,
strub

--- On Mon, 6/20/11, Dan Haywood<dkhayw...@gmail.com>
wrote:
From: Dan Haywood<dkhayw...@gmail.com>
Subject: [VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Isis
release
candidate 0.1.2-RC4-incubating
To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 7:43 AM
This vote is now closed, and has
passed:

6 +1 votes (+3 from members).
No 0 votes
No -1 votes.

I am now going to cut the final
release
(0.1.2-incubating)
from the same revision, and will
request a
lazy consensus
vote on general@incubator.a.o
for the final release.

Thanks, all
Dan