Nasir Bhai I wish you were right. Recently we tried to get a DXX circuit
within Karachi for a corporate client and were refused by PTCL as they
interpret our license differently. This reply we got after we applied
officially through ISPAK.
So if someone has any proof or letter from PTA then we can proceed further
with PTCL otherwise the client gets connected through Radio.
Please advice.
Regards,
Aly Ramzan
CubeXS
----- Original Message -----
From: "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Aly Ramzan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Ateeq.M.Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "sbhutta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: ISPAK: Re: Please make it fine to send to PTA
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Aly Ramzan wrote:
>
> > I think Ateeq Bhai's idea has merit. He is talking about providing
circuits
> > to companies within City without incurring unnecessary expense of paying
> > extra 500,000. When there is a province or nationwide need the license
can
> > always we upgraded.
>
> What circuits are you talking about ?? Data connectivity between offices,
> or Internet circuits. Because within city, most companies purchase radios,
> and will not get a service for that, and regarding Internet Circuits, I do
> not beleive that EIS cannot provide Internet to any one.
>
> >
> > I think it is a great idea and should be approved and implemented right
> > away. Otherwise ISP's will just be limited to selling dialup accounts,
which
> > really is not a good business model.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Aly Ramzan
> > CubeXS
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Ateeq.M.Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "sbhutta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: ISPAK: Re: Please make it fine to send to PTA
> >
> >
> > >
> > > DNOP provides service of Data Communication between customers. The big
> > > business is between customers of different cities, because people in
one
> > > city can use several other things like Radio etc.
> > >
> > > So DNOP for one city only, or even a province does not makes sense to
me.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Nasir.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Ateeq.M.Khan wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bhutta Sahib
> > > >
> > > > Why not amend the schedule of fees for DNOP on the basis of
National,
> > Provincial and City wise level ?
> > > >
> > > > Like :
> > > >
> > > > Nation wide : Rs 1,000,000 inclusive of EIS
> > > > Province wide : Rs 600,000 inclusive of EIS
> > > > Big City wide : Rs 500,000 inclusive of EIS
> > > >
> > > > I think it is logical to divide DNOP also because if you providing
> > service only in a big city then why would you like to pay extra fees to
PTA
> > ?
> > > > Please give your feed back. It is high time we get as much benefit
as
> > possible.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Ateeq Khan
> > > > CEO
> > > > Gem Net
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
> > > ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
> > > ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
> > > -------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
-------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
