Dear all,
If you provide connectivity thru a serial interface then you are required to
have a DNOP license. This is one distinction b/w the EIS and the DNOP
license.
Regards,
Saif Rahman
Chief Executive
eWorld (Pvt) Ltd.
506 Progressive Plaza,
Beaumont Rd., Civil Lines,
Karachi 75530
111-246-246/voice
92-21-5219318/fax
----- Original Message -----
From: "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "sbhutta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Aly Ramzan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ateeq.M.Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 27 June, 2001 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: ISPAK: Re: Please make it fine to send to PTA
>
> > The similar case was discussed and was decided in PTA. The case was IBM
> > ( Mr.Sana Zaidi) As DNOP provided bandwidth to Lahore Chamber but PTA
on
> > complaint of PTCL ordered to disconnect this circuit . PTA was in-view
that
> > only PTCL can provide bandwidth, at that time we got approval from PTA
that
> > DNOP can provides bandwidth to ISP and ISP can not provide bandwidth to
any
> > one.
>
> PTCL does not want us to do any thing. Any we do is illegal to them.
>
> We worked to agree PTA that DNOP can sell, so now we should fight to say
> that ISP can also.
>
> > Again PTCL charged that DNOP will pay US$47000/- for 2MB to sale
bandwidth,
> > Now again we won this battle and rates for DNOP and ISP declared same.
SITA
> > is paying US$.47000/- 2MB still. Where you live.
>
> So we will win again, Inshallah. But first we will have to put up a case.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Nasir.
>
> > Best regards,
> > Bhutta,
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Aly Ramzan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "Ateeq.M.Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "sbhutta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: ISPAK: Re: Please make it fine to send to PTA
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I am amazed to hear that, PTCL refused to provide a service to you.
PTA is
> > > the regulator not PTCL. We should take up this matter with PTA
> > > immediatelly.
> > >
> > > We got our license to sell Internet, and DXX is one way of providing
> > > Internet to customers, who require 24 hours service.
> > >
> > > I would request Bhutta sahib, to take up this matter immediately with
PTA,
> > > so you can provide service to your customer, and we can, to our future
> > > customers.
> > >
> > > I fail to understand why only having the license is not enough, and we
> > > have to provide letters from PTA for everyting.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Nasir.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Aly Ramzan wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nasir Bhai I wish you were right. Recently we tried to get a DXX
circuit
> > > > within Karachi for a corporate client and were refused by PTCL as
they
> > > > interpret our license differently. This reply we got after we
applied
> > > > officially through ISPAK.
> > > >
> > > > So if someone has any proof or letter from PTA then we can proceed
> > further
> > > > with PTCL otherwise the client gets connected through Radio.
> > > >
> > > > Please advice.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Aly Ramzan
> > > > CubeXS
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "Aly Ramzan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Cc: "Ateeq.M.Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "sbhutta"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:15 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: ISPAK: Re: Please make it fine to send to PTA
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Aly Ramzan wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I think Ateeq Bhai's idea has merit. He is talking about
providing
> > > > circuits
> > > > > > to companies within City without incurring unnecessary expense
of
> > paying
> > > > > > extra 500,000. When there is a province or nationwide need the
> > license
> > > > can
> > > > > > always we upgraded.
> > > > >
> > > > > What circuits are you talking about ?? Data connectivity between
> > offices,
> > > > > or Internet circuits. Because within city, most companies purchase
> > radios,
> > > > > and will not get a service for that, and regarding Internet
Circuits,
> > I do
> > > > > not beleive that EIS cannot provide Internet to any one.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think it is a great idea and should be approved and
implemented
> > right
> > > > > > away. Otherwise ISP's will just be limited to selling dialup
> > accounts,
> > > > which
> > > > > > really is not a good business model.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Aly Ramzan
> > > > > > CubeXS
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > To: "Ateeq.M.Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > Cc: "sbhutta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:43 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: ISPAK: Re: Please make it fine to send to PTA
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > DNOP provides service of Data Communication between customers.
The
> > big
> > > > > > > business is between customers of different cities, because
people
> > in
> > > > one
> > > > > > > city can use several other things like Radio etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So DNOP for one city only, or even a province does not makes
sense
> > to
> > > > me.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nasir.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Ateeq.M.Khan wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bhutta Sahib
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Why not amend the schedule of fees for DNOP on the basis of
> > > > National,
> > > > > > Provincial and City wise level ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Like :
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Nation wide : Rs 1,000,000 inclusive of EIS
> > > > > > > > Province wide : Rs 600,000 inclusive of EIS
> > > > > > > > Big City wide : Rs 500,000 inclusive of EIS
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think it is logical to divide DNOP also because if you
> > providing
> > > > > > service only in a big city then why would you like to pay extra
fees
> > to
> > > > PTA
> > > > > > ?
> > > > > > > > Please give your feed back. It is high time we get as much
> > benefit
> > > > as
> > > > > > possible.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ateeq Khan
> > > > > > > > CEO
> > > > > > > > Gem Net
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
> > > > > > > ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
> > > > > > > ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
> > > > > > > -------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
> > ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
> > ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
> > -------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
> ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
> ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
> -------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
-------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
