The similar case was discussed and was decided in PTA. The case was IBM
( Mr.Sana Zaidi) As DNOP provided bandwidth to Lahore Chamber but PTA on
complaint of PTCL ordered to disconnect this circuit . PTA was in-view that
only PTCL can provide bandwidth, at that time we got approval from PTA that
DNOP can provides bandwidth to ISP and ISP can not provide bandwidth to any
one.
Again PTCL charged that DNOP will pay US$47000/- for 2MB to sale bandwidth,
Now again we won this battle and rates for DNOP and ISP declared same. SITA
is paying US$.47000/- 2MB still. Where you live.
Best regards,
Bhutta,
----- Original Message -----
From: "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Aly Ramzan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Ateeq.M.Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "sbhutta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: ISPAK: Re: Please make it fine to send to PTA
>
> I am amazed to hear that, PTCL refused to provide a service to you. PTA is
> the regulator not PTCL. We should take up this matter with PTA
> immediatelly.
>
> We got our license to sell Internet, and DXX is one way of providing
> Internet to customers, who require 24 hours service.
>
> I would request Bhutta sahib, to take up this matter immediately with PTA,
> so you can provide service to your customer, and we can, to our future
> customers.
>
> I fail to understand why only having the license is not enough, and we
> have to provide letters from PTA for everyting.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nasir.
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Aly Ramzan wrote:
>
> > Nasir Bhai I wish you were right. Recently we tried to get a DXX circuit
> > within Karachi for a corporate client and were refused by PTCL as they
> > interpret our license differently. This reply we got after we applied
> > officially through ISPAK.
> >
> > So if someone has any proof or letter from PTA then we can proceed
further
> > with PTCL otherwise the client gets connected through Radio.
> >
> > Please advice.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Aly Ramzan
> > CubeXS
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Aly Ramzan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "Ateeq.M.Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "sbhutta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:15 PM
> > Subject: Re: ISPAK: Re: Please make it fine to send to PTA
> >
> >
> > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Aly Ramzan wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think Ateeq Bhai's idea has merit. He is talking about providing
> > circuits
> > > > to companies within City without incurring unnecessary expense of
paying
> > > > extra 500,000. When there is a province or nationwide need the
license
> > can
> > > > always we upgraded.
> > >
> > > What circuits are you talking about ?? Data connectivity between
offices,
> > > or Internet circuits. Because within city, most companies purchase
radios,
> > > and will not get a service for that, and regarding Internet Circuits,
I do
> > > not beleive that EIS cannot provide Internet to any one.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I think it is a great idea and should be approved and implemented
right
> > > > away. Otherwise ISP's will just be limited to selling dialup
accounts,
> > which
> > > > really is not a good business model.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Aly Ramzan
> > > > CubeXS
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "Ateeq.M.Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Cc: "sbhutta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:43 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: ISPAK: Re: Please make it fine to send to PTA
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > DNOP provides service of Data Communication between customers. The
big
> > > > > business is between customers of different cities, because people
in
> > one
> > > > > city can use several other things like Radio etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > So DNOP for one city only, or even a province does not makes sense
to
> > me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Nasir.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Ateeq.M.Khan wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Bhutta Sahib
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why not amend the schedule of fees for DNOP on the basis of
> > National,
> > > > Provincial and City wise level ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Like :
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Nation wide : Rs 1,000,000 inclusive of EIS
> > > > > > Province wide : Rs 600,000 inclusive of EIS
> > > > > > Big City wide : Rs 500,000 inclusive of EIS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think it is logical to divide DNOP also because if you
providing
> > > > service only in a big city then why would you like to pay extra fees
to
> > PTA
> > > > ?
> > > > > > Please give your feed back. It is high time we get as much
benefit
> > as
> > > > possible.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ateeq Khan
> > > > > > CEO
> > > > > > Gem Net
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
> > > > > ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
> > > > > ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
> > > > > -------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
-------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
