[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3493?focusedWorklogId=654580&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-654580
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-3493:
-------------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 23/Sep/21 15:39
Start Date: 23/Sep/21 15:39
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: gemmellr commented on pull request #3766:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3766#issuecomment-925930422
For the purpose of this change I would just refer to it as the Message ID
for the new bits, and have any descriptions/doc note the Message ID in question
is 'also referred to as UserID in some areas', as opposed to the reverse
approach it takes now. I think it would be more in line with user expectations
and be plenty clear from the 'send with message id' context what it all means.
Going beyond that, if you mean for e.g the other table referencing it as
User ID, I'd also go with swapping it for some variation of Message ID there
that too if possible, e.g change the format in some way, and also updating the
other existing 'Message ID' to be referred to as something else (e.g simply ID,
or Broker Message ID, or perhaps Message Store ID since thats what it seems to
really represent...could also swap ID with Index). Alternatively if changing
how that is referenced isnt also possible, then just something long winded like
Application Message ID would still seem a lot more obvious/intuitive than User
ID.
If you mean the larger change, then I would go with e.g ID / Broker ID /
Message Store ID in place of the existing MessageID and deprecate that.
Something else to replace UserID (e.g MessageID with different format such as
its capitalization, separator etc). Later remove the old stuff entirely.
I think its also worth saying that any management operations etc that do
currently take a 'Message ID' currently, i.e the store id, are taking a long.
If changing things so the application style 'message id' is stored in and
referenced by something named more like 'message id', I dont think this would
cause that much confusion since most people are likely used to that being
another type e.g String, so I dont think it would become particularly unclear
for e.g manager uses that it changed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 654580)
Time Spent: 1.5h (was: 1h 20m)
> expose the User ID in the send message tab in console
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-3493
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-3493
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Andy Taylor
> Assignee: Andy Taylor
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 1.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> this field in the core message is used to keep the JMS Message ID, it would
> be nice to have one auto generated if a checkbox is checked
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
