[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4007?focusedWorklogId=810735&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-810735
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-4007:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 21/Sep/22 12:47
            Start Date: 21/Sep/22 12:47
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: gtully commented on code in PR #4228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4228#discussion_r976462380


##########
tests/integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/integration/server/ConfigurationTest.java:
##########
@@ -122,6 +124,9 @@ public void testPropertiesConfigReload() throws Exception {
             return mytopic_31.getBindings().size() == 3;
          });
 
+         // verify round trip apply
+         
Assert.assertTrue(server.getActiveMQServerControl().getStatus().contains("2"));

Review Comment:
   they are atomic enough via the configuration reload. A new instance is 
created/modified and swapped. What I want to know in this case is that a reload 
has happened.





Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 810735)
    Time Spent: 50m  (was: 40m)

> properties config - complete feedback loop with server status attribute
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-4007
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4007
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Configuration
>    Affects Versions: 2.25.0
>            Reporter: Gary Tully
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Following on from ARTEMIS-4001 - in kubernetties - where properties can be 
> mounted as  projections of config maps, there can be a large delay between 
> update and the refresh being visible to the broker.
> Adding a status attribute to the server control that is driven by 
> configuration, will allow properties files to embed version or status 
> information and see those reflected via admin or jolokia queries.
> This then provides a nice feedback loop. I am calling it status like MetaData 
> status, but also leaving it free form such that any sensible json can be 
> embedded once there is coordination.
> Initially the value will just be set like any property.
> Eventually it could provide an entry point for the parser to inform of 
> property key=value mismatch or errors on update in some "error" section. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to