[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16482661#comment-16482661
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CALCITE-2294:
-----------------------------------------
Github user joshelser commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/48#discussion_r189632752
--- Diff:
server/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/avatica/server/HttpServer.java ---
@@ -239,18 +239,8 @@ protected void internalStart() {
server.setConnectors(new Connector[] { connector });
// Default to using the handler that was passed in
- final HandlerList handlerList = new HandlerList();
- Handler avaticaHandler = handler;
-
- // Wrap the provided handler for security if we made one
- if (null != securityHandler) {
- securityHandler.setHandler(handler);
- avaticaHandler = securityHandler;
- }
+ configureHandlers(securityHandler);
--- End diff --
At this point, `securityHandler` is null because you don't have a case
statement for `CUSTOM` a few lines above.
This means that your CUSTOM AuthenticationType is obtusely "unimplemented".
There isn't any clarity in here for me to know what security methods on the
`AvaticaServerConfiguration` will actually have effect, and which will not.
For example, I may try to configure the login realm via the `ASC`, but I
don't think that would actually be interrogated. When constructing the Jetty
server.
> Allow customization for AvaticaServerConfiguration for plugging new
> authentication mechanisms
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2294
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2294
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: avatica
> Reporter: Karan Mehta
> Priority: Major
>
> {{AvaticaServerConfiguration}} is currently only created if authentication
> mechanism such as {{BASIC, DIGEST or SPNEGO}} is provided. We can change it
> to a builder pattern to create this object and provide a way for users to
> plugin their own security configuration.
> An example here can be using it for custom config that supports MTLS.
> Thanks [~alexaraujo] for suggesting this approach.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)