[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15008769#comment-15008769
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9063:
--------------------------------------------
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1066#issuecomment-157392000
Hi @DaanHoogland,
I run integration tests before creating the PRs and that's not manually and
I do have only 1 bubble. I just do:
* build code/RPMs
* run MS
* deploy DC
* run tests
I could do that before the bubble as well... remember my endless iptables
list? ;)
I only feel comfortable with creating a PR if I know the system is still
working. I have been fixing problems before due to PRs that were not tested and
broke master. With me it only happened 2 times, but it took me 4 weeks to find
out which commit - not mine - broke it. I am just trying to avoid that again.
Concerning the inline get calls, you don't have to change it. It would
improve readability, but that's not a blocker. However, the PR needs to be
tested against XenServer at least by 1 reviewer - or a CI that tests something
(not against a simulator).
Cheers,
Wilder
> CitrixResourceBase refactor
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9063
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9063
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Daan Hoogland
>
> https://analysis.apache.org/drilldown/measures/100206?metric=class_complexity
> report on the class is pretty bad. Some trivial changes can be done to
> improve. miracles won't happen but improvements can be made.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)