[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17216247#comment-17216247
]
Michael Vorburger commented on FINERACT-1212:
---------------------------------------------
Oh! Interesting. That makes a little bit more sense now - but still seems ugly
and unnecessary (as from a Java PoV, the _operations_ with same name on
separate Java interfaces don't clash). So yeah, if you can figure out how to
fix that, could be cool.. but obviously not really super "blocking" anything,
either. NB that I'm actually using {{ClientApi.retrieveAll20()}} in
https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1428, so after that's merged, if you
figure out how to fix this, then that test needs to adapted as part of the PR
about this.
> SDK Swagger Client Java API method names are ugly
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-1212
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1212
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger
> Priority: Major
> Labels: beginner
>
> I am, for the first time, attempting to fool around with our shiny new SDK
> Client Java API, for FINERACT-1209.
> It seems that its method names are a bit ugly - what is e.g. that *20 suffix
> in {{org.apache.fineract.client.services.ClientApi.retrieveAll20()}} for?
> [~aleks] [~ChinmayKulkarni] [~ptuomola] [~manthan]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
