[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17227865#comment-17227865
]
Aleksandar Vidakovic commented on FINERACT-1212:
------------------------------------------------
Have to carve out some time for this... the current generator strategy doesn't
deliver stable results. I think they don't even guarantee that the functions
are somehow strictly ordered... so the next time you add another retrieveAll
somewhere else all the numbering could change... which means even minor changes
in the REST API will result in backward incompatible fineract-client JARs.
> SDK Swagger Client Java API method names are ugly
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-1212
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1212
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SDK
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger
> Priority: Major
> Labels: beginner
>
> I am, for the first time, attempting to fool around with our shiny new SDK
> Client Java API, for FINERACT-1209.
> It seems that its method names are a bit ugly - what is e.g. that *20 suffix
> in {{org.apache.fineract.client.services.ClientApi.retrieveAll20()}} for?
> [~aleks] [~ChinmayKulkarni] [~ptuomola] [~manthan]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
