pnowojski commented on a change in pull request #10029:  [FLINK-14553][runtime] 
Respect non-blocking output in StreamTask#processInput
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/10029#discussion_r341069414
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/runtime/tasks/StreamTask.java
 ##########
 @@ -281,10 +289,41 @@ protected void processInput(DefaultActionContext 
context) throws Exception {
                if (status == InputStatus.END_OF_INPUT) {
                        context.allActionsCompleted();
                }
-               else if (status == InputStatus.NOTHING_AVAILABLE) {
+
+               CompletableFuture<?> jointFuture = 
getInputOutputJointFuture(status);
+               if (jointFuture != null) {
                        SuspendedMailboxDefaultAction suspendedDefaultAction = 
context.suspendDefaultAction();
-                       
inputProcessor.getAvailableFuture().thenRun(suspendedDefaultAction::resume);
+                       jointFuture.thenRun(suspendedDefaultAction::resume);
+               }
+       }
+
+       /**
+        * @return a combination of input and output futures if at-least one 
future of them is not
+        * completed, otherwise return null if all input and outputs are 
available.
+        */
+       private CompletableFuture<?> getInputOutputJointFuture(InputStatus 
status) {
+               if (status == InputStatus.MORE_AVAILABLE && 
isOutputAvailable()) {
+                       return null;
+               }
+
+               int length = recordWriters.size();
+               for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
+                       inputOutputFutures[i] = 
recordWriters.get(i).getAvailableFuture();
+               }
+               inputOutputFutures[length] = 
inputProcessor.getAvailableFuture();
+               return CompletableFuture.allOf(inputOutputFutures);
+       }
+
+       /**
+        * @return true if all the record writers are available.
+        */
+       private boolean isOutputAvailable() {
+               for (RecordWriter recordWriter : recordWriters) {
+                       if (!recordWriter.isAvailable()) {
 
 Review comment:
   > I am not quite sure of it, so my previous thought was to avoid impacting 
the unrelevant path in best-effort way, otherwise we have to verify the 
performance concern.
   
   I think we have the benchmarks coverage for this, so I would do it and just 
check the benchmark results.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to