Miuler commented on PR #252:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/252#issuecomment-1146460454
> @Miuler I looked into this a little and this is the only thing we need to
change for this to work (and make your test to pass):
>
> ```
> diff --git
a/flink-kubernetes-operator/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/operator/reconciler/deployment/ApplicationReconciler.java
b/flink-kubernetes-operator/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/operator/reconciler/deployment/ApplicationReconciler.java
> index 442206f9..f5beddbb 100644
> ---
a/flink-kubernetes-operator/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/operator/reconciler/deployment/ApplicationReconciler.java
> +++
b/flink-kubernetes-operator/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/operator/reconciler/deployment/ApplicationReconciler.java
> @@ -324,7 +324,12 @@ public class ApplicationReconciler extends
AbstractDeploymentReconciler {
> @Override
> @SneakyThrows
> protected void shutdown(FlinkDeployment flinkApp) {
> - flinkService.cancelJob(flinkApp, UpgradeMode.STATELESS);
> + var status = flinkApp.getStatus();
> + if (status.getReconciliationStatus().getLastReconciledSpec() ==
null) {
> + flinkService.deleteClusterDeployment(flinkApp.getMetadata(),
status, true);
> + } else {
> + flinkService.cancelJob(flinkApp, UpgradeMode.STATELESS);
> + }
> }
>
> private void triggerSavepoint(FlinkDeployment deployment) throws
Exception {
> ```
>
> This is also a more straightforward fix because the main problem is
calling cancel job on something that was never deployed (it doesn't really make
sense in the first place so no wonder it was broken)
ok, I thinks it is better. :D
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
