[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16146161#comment-16146161
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-3529:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 00a0490d568c7f6b672d83cb2ee064bfe52d787a in geode's branch
refs/heads/develop from [~bschuchardt]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=00a0490 ]
GEODE-3529 move new client/server security classes to a different package
The new classes/interfaces have been moved to org.apache.geode.security.server.
A package.html is now provided that describes the purpose of the package.
The word "Stream" has been removed from the names of these classes. Those
names make sense in the context of the Protobuf support classes in
org.apache.geode.internal.cache.tier.sockets classes but not when taken
as a separate group of classes.
The method Authenticator.receiveMessage() has been renamed to
Authenticator.authenticate().
This closes #746
> move new client/server security classes to a different package
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-3529
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3529
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: client/server
> Reporter: Bruce Schuchardt
> Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> The StreamAuthenticator, StreamAuthorizer and associated classes were put in
> the org.apache.geode.security package but they are only peripherally
> associated with the other classes in that package. They should be moved to a
> different package that has its own package.html.
> The "Stream" name should be removed since they are intended for client/server
> authentication and authorization and _not_ authentication of streams in
> general. Also, the method "receiveMessage" seems an odd name for requesting
> authentication. Perhaps "authenticate" would be better?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
