[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13999365#comment-13999365
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-11139:
--------------------------------
ABORTED: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #5132 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/5132/])
HBASE-11139 BoundedPriorityBlockingQueue#poll() should check the return value
from awaitNanos() (Shengzhe Yao) (mbertozzi: rev 1593854)
*
/hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/BoundedPriorityBlockingQueue.java
*
/hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestBoundedPriorityBlockingQueue.java
> BoundedPriorityBlockingQueue#poll() should check the return value from
> awaitNanos()
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11139
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11139
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.99.0
> Reporter: Ted Yu
> Assignee: Shengzhe Yao
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: noob
> Fix For: 0.99.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-11139-v1.patch, HBASE-11139-v2.patch,
> HBASE-11139-v3.patch, HBASE-11139-v4.patch
>
>
> nanos represents the timeout value.
> {code}
> while (queue.size() == 0 && nanos > 0) {
> notEmpty.awaitNanos(nanos);
> }
> {code}
> The return value from awaitNanos() should be checked - otherwise we may wait
> for period longer than the timeout value.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)