[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14149944#comment-14149944
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-12090:
-------------------------------

bq. This is not a pure Get test. I do not use HTable API, but use directly 
RegionScannerImpl to bypass all IPC-related overhead.

Ok. Then 15% is more believable.  Is it a little harness you wrote?  Whats it 
look like?  Thanks V.

> Bytes: more Unsafe, more Faster 
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12090
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12090
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Performance
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.23, 0.98.6
>            Reporter: Vladimir Rodionov
>            Assignee: Vladimir Rodionov
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 0.98.7, 0.94.24, 0.99.1
>
>         Attachments: 12090-v1.1.txt, HBASE-12090.2.patch, HBASE-12090.patch
>
>
> Additional optimizations to *org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.Bytes*:
> * New version of compareTo method.
> * New versions for primitive converters  : putXXX/toXXX.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to