[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14539992#comment-14539992
]
stack commented on HBASE-13448:
-------------------------------
Is there too much machinery involved to run a jmh micro-benchmark on cache vs
non-caching of row offset, row length (and whatever you think we should cache)?
Numbers are pretty crazy [~anoop.hbase] You going to do more compares? Adding
explicit tracker and pure get of a single cell? Nice work.
> New Cell implementation with cached component offsets/lengths
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-13448
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13448
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Scanners
> Reporter: Anoop Sam John
> Assignee: Anoop Sam John
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-13448.patch, HBASE-13448_V2.patch, gc.png, hits.png
>
>
> This can be extension to KeyValue and can be instantiated and used in read
> path.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
