[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14696507#comment-14696507
]
stack commented on HBASE-14144:
-------------------------------
bq. Intention was not to argue, just to tell what I felt.
Didn't think otherwise Ram!
Classes called 'fake' though they have a strong character -- i.e. they are the
first on the row, or they return empty buffers no matter what -- and can be
instantiated as actual, non-fake classes seemed off. Comments are not exactly
right either in their use of fake but I get the gist and these are less
important I'd say.
+1 to commit new renames.
> Bloomfilter path to work with Byte buffered cells
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14144
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: regionserver, Scanners
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-14144.patch, HBASE-14144_1.patch,
> HBASE-14144_2.patch, HBASE-14144_3.patch, HBASE-14144_4.patch,
> HBASE-14144_5.patch
>
>
> This JIRA is to check if there will be a need to make the bloom filters to
> work with ByteBuffer cells. During POC this path created lot of duplicated
> code but considering other refactorings done in this path may lead to less
> duplication. This JIRA is a placeholder.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
