[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14696465#comment-14696465
]
ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-14144:
------------------------------------------------
bq.FakeByteBufferedCell is not fake either. It is also real. If it is anything,
it is abstract. AbstractByteBufferedCell.
IMHO, the components of the cell are real, but the type of the cell is fake. We
don't have actual cells with MAX or MIN type. It is not going to be even
written to files or returned back as a cell to clients.
If we name it as AbstractBytebufferedcell, then it would mean we need to derive
cells out of it, I think? Also we already have a Fakecell backed by byte[]. So
'Fake' term is correct is what I think.
> Bloomfilter path to work with Byte buffered cells
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-14144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14144
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: regionserver, Scanners
> Reporter: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-14144.patch, HBASE-14144_1.patch,
> HBASE-14144_2.patch, HBASE-14144_3.patch, HBASE-14144_4.patch,
> HBASE-14144_5.patch
>
>
> This JIRA is to check if there will be a need to make the bloom filters to
> work with ByteBuffer cells. During POC this path created lot of duplicated
> code but considering other refactorings done in this path may lead to less
> duplication. This JIRA is a placeholder.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
