[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15796975#comment-15796975
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17372:
-----------------------------------
You can see the discussion in HBASE-17361. I'm neutral on whether the Table
instance should be thread safe or not. [~carp84] said with thread safe HTable
they can get a better performance, and some other guys think a thread safe
table is more friendly to end users.
> Make AsyncTable thread safe
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-17372
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17372
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: asyncclient, Client
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-17372-v1.patch, HBASE-17372-v2.patch,
> HBASE-17372-v3.patch, HBASE-17372.patch
>
>
> The most methods are already thread safe. The problem is that we have some
> methods that used to set timeout, we need to remove these methods and add a
> parameter for each call to specific timeout settings.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
