[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15799362#comment-15799362 ]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-17372: --------------------------------------- bq. You can see the discussion in HBASE-17361. I'm neutral on whether the Table instance should be thread safe or not. Thanks for the pointer. Great that we are having the discussions for both at the same time. I would say that we must annotate Table and AsyncTable either both thread-safe or both not thread-safe. Otherwise, it will be a mess. > Make AsyncTable thread safe > --------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-17372 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17372 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: asyncclient, Client > Affects Versions: 2.0.0 > Reporter: Duo Zhang > Assignee: Duo Zhang > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > Attachments: HBASE-17372-v1.patch, HBASE-17372-v2.patch, > HBASE-17372-v3.patch, HBASE-17372.patch > > > The most methods are already thread safe. The problem is that we have some > methods that used to set timeout, we need to remove these methods and add a > parameter for each call to specific timeout settings. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)